Peer-Review Process

Peer review is the primary measure of quality maintenance for scientific articles. It is the standard validation process through which independent experts evaluate the originality, novelty, and significance of manuscripts. Peer review assists the editors in making decisions regarding the publication or improvements required for submitted articles.

Andrew John Publishing follows a single-blinded peer-review process to ensure impartial editorial decision making.

We value our reviewers’ expert opinions regarding submitted articles. Depending upon their comments and the editor’s own opinions, the editor makes one of three decisions: rejection, revision, or acceptance of the submitted articles.

Manuscripts are sent back to the respective authors for revisions if required. Once the authors re-submit their revised manuscripts, the editor may make a decision on the manuscripts or send them back to the reviewers for reevaluation. Final decisions regarding the publication or withdrawal of articles are made by the editor.

The peer-review process enriches the quality of the submitted manuscripts and, hence, ensures that our scientific articles meet a rigorous standard prior to publication on a global platform.